[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e0204a28-7e3a-48f9-aea9-20b35294ada6@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 09:16:09 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: tang.dongxing@....com.cn, davem@...emloft.net, feng.wei8@....com.cn,
shao.mingyin@....com.cn, xie.ludan@....com.cn
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
horms@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yang.guang5@....com.cn, yang.yang29@....com.cn, ye.xingchen@....com.cn,
xu.xin16@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: atm: use sysfs_emit_at() instead of scnprintf()
On 17/03/2025 08:51, tang.dongxing@....com.cn wrote:
> From: TangDongxing <tang.dongxing@....com.cn>
>
> Follow the advice in Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst:
> show() should only use sysfs_emit() or sysfs_emit_at() when formatting
> the value to be returned to user space.
>
> Signed-off-by: TangDongxing <tang.dongxing@....com.cn>
Dear ZTE,
Can you slow down? You sent a bunch of emails with similar issues which
means that dozen of maintainers will deal with the same issues
independently. This looks like another vivo or huawei style submission,
leading to bugs sneaked via flood of patches.
First, fix the name used in the SoB (see submitting patches) to match
Latin transcription.
Second, use proper SoB chain, see submitting patches.
Third, really, really be sure that what you send is correct. You already
got quite responses, but you still keep sending patches.
Fourth, respond to received feedback instead of flooding us with more of
this!
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists