[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250317170902154iQh7_gBiO8KjCrFrhnAqn@zte.com.cn>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:09:02 +0800 (CST)
From: <tang.dongxing@....com.cn>
To: <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: <davem@...emloft.net>, <feng.wei8@....com.cn>, <shao.mingyin@....com.cn>,
<xie.ludan@....com.cn>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <horms@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <yang.guang5@....com.cn>,
<yang.yang29@....com.cn>, <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>,
<xu.xin16@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: atm: use sysfs_emit_at() instead of scnprintf()
>On 17/03/2025 08:51, tang.dongxing@....com.cn wrote:> From: TangDongxing <tang.dongxing@....com.cn>
>>
>> Follow the advice in Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst:
>> show() should only use sysfs_emit() or sysfs_emit_at() when formatting
>> the value to be returned to user space.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tang Dongxing <tang.dongxing@....com.cn>Dear ZTE,
>
>Can you slow down? You sent a bunch of emails with similar issues which
>means that dozen of maintainers will deal with the same issues
>independently. This looks like another vivo or huawei style submission,
>leading to bugs sneaked via flood of patches.
>
>First, fix the name used in the SoB (see submitting patches) to match
>Latin transcription.
>
>Second, use proper SoB chain, see submitting patches.
>
>Third, really, really be sure that what you send is correct. You already
>got quite responses, but you still keep sending patches.
>
>Fourth, respond to received feedback instead of flooding us with more of
>this!
Dear Krzysztof,
Thank you for your feedback. I apologize for my previous submissions.
Regarding the issues you've pointed out:
I will correct the name used in the SoB to ensure it matches the Latin transcription as required.
I will double-check my work before sending any further updates.
I appreciate your guidance and will follow the submission guidelines more carefully going forward. If you have any further advice or resources to help me improve my submissions, I would be grateful for your input.
Best regards,
Tang Dongxing
<div class="zcontentRow"><p>>On 17/03/2025 08:51, tang.dongxing@....com.cn wrote:> From: TangDongxing <tang.dongxing@....com.cn></p><p>>> </p><p>>> Follow the advice in Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst:</p><p>>> show() should only use sysfs_emit() or sysfs_emit_at() when formatting</p><p>>> the value to be returned to user space.</p><p>>> </p><p>>> Signed-off-by: Tang Dongxing <tang.dongxing@....com.cn>Dear ZTE,</p><p>></p><p>>Can you slow down? You sent a bunch of emails with similar issues which</p><p>>means that dozen of maintainers will deal with the same issues</p><p>>independently. This looks like another vivo or huawei style submission,</p><p>>leading to bugs sneaked via flood of patches.</p><p>></p><p>>First, fix the name used in the SoB (see submitting patches) to match</p><p>>Latin transcription.</p><p>></p><p>>Second, use proper SoB chain, see submitting patches.</p><p>></p><p>>Third, really, really be sure that what you send is correct. You already</p><p>>got quite responses, but you still keep sending patches.</p><p>></p><p>>Fourth, respond to received feedback instead of flooding us with more of</p><p>>this!</p><p><br></p><p>Dear Krzysztof,</p><p>Thank you for your feedback. I apologize for my previous submissions.</p><p>Regarding the issues you've pointed out:</p><p>I will correct the name used in the SoB to ensure it matches the Latin transcription as required.</p><p>I will double-check my work before sending any further updates.</p><p>I appreciate your guidance and will follow the submission guidelines more carefully going forward. If you have any further advice or resources to help me improve my submissions, I would be grateful for your input.</p><p>Best regards, </p><p>Tang Dongxing</p><p><br></p></div>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists