[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <663a958b-3847-41e3-9710-897446694bc2@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 09:24:48 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: feng.wei8@....com.cn, sumit.semwal@...aro.org, xie.ludan@....com.cn,
shao.mingyin@....com.cn, tang.dongxing@....com.cn
Cc: benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com, brian.starkey@....com,
jstultz@...gle.com, tjmercier@...gle.com, christian.koenig@....com,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] dma-buf: heap: Replace nested max() with single max3()
On 17/03/2025 03:37, feng.wei8@....com.cn wrote:
> From: FengWei <feng.wei8@....com.cn>
>
> Use max3() macro instead of nesting max() to simplify the return
> statement.
>
> Signed-off-by: FengWei <feng.wei8@....com.cn>
> ---
> v3 -> v4
> fix the format of this patch.
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c | 2 +-
You sent five versions per day of the same patch.
Look what was in v3:
v2 -> v3
fix the format of this patch
So you are doing the same over and over and sending it to us?
Srsly, ZTE, slow down and be sure you follow the process BEFORE you send
flood of patches like that and learn on the go.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists