lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <09c18763-7a60-4eea-b77b-85260b8b6b02@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 16:37:18 +0100
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Mike Marshall" <hubcap@...ibond.com>,
 "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: "Christian Brauner" <brauner@...nel.org>,
 "Matthew Wilcox" <willy@...radead.org>,
 "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs-brauner tree

On Tue, Mar 18, 2025, at 16:24, Mike Marshall wrote:
> Hi Stephen... is there something I should do differently? I might be
> using an older
> version of the patch, it was sent to me around three weeks ago.
>
>>>Caused by commit
>  >> 50fb0a7f43c0 ("orangefs: Move s_kmod_keyword_mask_map to
> orangefs-debugfs.c")
>>>merging badly with commit
>  >> 063f8013373a ("orangefs: move s_kmod_keyword_mask_map[] into debugfs.c")
>
> One has "Move" the one I'm using has "move", as if the author (Arnd)
> made an update
> to the patch and maybe I missed it...?

The earlier patch was from Matthew Wilcox. Our two patches are
almost identical (they add the same data in different parts of the
file) but sent independently, and the problem was that both got
applied instead of just one. I think the easiest fix would be
if you just drop my patch from your tree.

     Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ