[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOg9mSRB05JSF9nfruWov+Os8tfXE8KyE4GVk5Pgp3pnA-4jow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 11:42:15 -0400
From: Mike Marshall <hubcap@...ibond.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Marshall <hubcap@...ibond.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs-brauner tree
Arnd... thanks, I'll get 'er done...
-Mike
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 11:38 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025, at 16:24, Mike Marshall wrote:
> > Hi Stephen... is there something I should do differently? I might be
> > using an older
> > version of the patch, it was sent to me around three weeks ago.
> >
> >>>Caused by commit
> > >> 50fb0a7f43c0 ("orangefs: Move s_kmod_keyword_mask_map to
> > orangefs-debugfs.c")
> >>>merging badly with commit
> > >> 063f8013373a ("orangefs: move s_kmod_keyword_mask_map[] into debugfs.c")
> >
> > One has "Move" the one I'm using has "move", as if the author (Arnd)
> > made an update
> > to the patch and maybe I missed it...?
>
> The earlier patch was from Matthew Wilcox. Our two patches are
> almost identical (they add the same data in different parts of the
> file) but sent independently, and the problem was that both got
> applied instead of just one. I think the easiest fix would be
> if you just drop my patch from your tree.
>
> Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists