[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7920c2c-1051-4674-994c-d1b681cf7988@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 23:01:49 -0700
From: Xin Li <xin@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
"Ahmed S . Darwish" <darwi@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin"
<hpa@...or.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86/cpuid: Use u32 in instead of uint32_t in
<asm/cpuid/api.h>
On 3/17/2025 3:18 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Use u32 instead of uint32_t in hypervisor_cpuid_base().
>
> Yes, I realize uint32_t is used in Xen code et al, but this is
> a core x86 architecture header and we should standardize on the
no "we", right?
> type that is being used overwhelmingly in related x86 architecture
> code.
>
> The two types are the same so there should be no build warnings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
> Cc: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwi@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
> Cc: x86-cpuid@...ts.linux.dev
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250317164745.4754-3-darwi@linutronix.de
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid/api.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid/api.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid/api.h
> index 356db1894588..9c180c9cc58e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid/api.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid/api.h
> @@ -187,9 +187,9 @@ static __always_inline bool cpuid_function_is_indexed(u32 function)
> #define for_each_possible_hypervisor_cpuid_base(function) \
> for (function = 0x40000000; function < 0x40010000; function += 0x100)
>
> -static inline uint32_t hypervisor_cpuid_base(const char *sig, uint32_t leaves)
> +static inline u32 hypervisor_cpuid_base(const char *sig, u32 leaves)
> {
> - uint32_t base, eax, signature[3];
> + u32 base, eax, signature[3];
>
> for_each_possible_hypervisor_cpuid_base(base) {
> cpuid(base, &eax, &signature[0], &signature[1], &signature[2]);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists