lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef48d387-fb22-4059-a887-c9438c6e33b1@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 14:50:04 +0800
From: Wang Liang <wangliang74@...wei.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
	Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
	<jv@...sburgh.net>, <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	<ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <hawk@...nel.org>,
	<john.fastabend@...il.com>, <joamaki@...il.com>
CC: <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, <zhangchangzhong@...wei.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bonding: check xdp prog when set bond mode


在 2025/3/17 15:39, Nikolay Aleksandrov 写道:
> On 3/17/25 06:07, Wang Liang wrote:
>> 在 2025/3/14 18:44, Nikolay Aleksandrov 写道:
>>> On 3/14/25 12:22 PM, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>>>> On 3/14/25 12:13 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>>>> Wang Liang <wangliang74@...wei.com> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Following operations can trigger a warning[1]:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       ip netns add ns1
>>>>>>       ip netns exec ns1 ip link add bond0 type bond mode balance-rr
>>>>>>       ip netns exec ns1 ip link set dev bond0 xdp obj af_xdp_kern.o sec xdp
>>>>>>       ip netns exec ns1 ip link set bond0 type bond mode broadcast
>>>>>>       ip netns del ns1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When delete the namespace, dev_xdp_uninstall() is called to remove xdp
>>>>>> program on bond dev, and bond_xdp_set() will check the bond mode. If bond
>>>>>> mode is changed after attaching xdp program, the warning may occur.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some bond modes (broadcast, etc.) do not support native xdp. Set bond mode
>>>>>> with xdp program attached is not good. Add check for xdp program when set
>>>>>> bond mode.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       [1]
>>>>>>       ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>>>>       WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 11 at net/core/dev.c:9912 unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x8d9/0x930
>>>>>>       Modules linked in:
>>>>>>       CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 11 Comm: kworker/u4:0 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc4 #107
>>>>>>       Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.15.0-0-g2dd4b9b3f840-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
>>>>>>       Workqueue: netns cleanup_net
>>>>>>       RIP: 0010:unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x8d9/0x930
>>>>>>       Code: 00 00 48 c7 c6 6f e3 a2 82 48 c7 c7 d0 b3 96 82 e8 9c 10 3e ...
>>>>>>       RSP: 0018:ffffc90000063d80 EFLAGS: 00000282
>>>>>>       RAX: 00000000ffffffa1 RBX: ffff888004959000 RCX: 00000000ffffdfff
>>>>>>       RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000ffffffea RDI: ffffc90000063b48
>>>>>>       RBP: ffffc90000063e28 R08: ffffffff82d39b28 R09: 0000000000009ffb
>>>>>>       R10: 0000000000000175 R11: ffffffff82d09b40 R12: ffff8880049598e8
>>>>>>       R13: 0000000000000001 R14: dead000000000100 R15: ffffc90000045000
>>>>>>       FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888007a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>>>>>>       CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>>>>>>       CR2: 000000000d406b60 CR3: 000000000483e000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
>>>>>>       Call Trace:
>>>>>>        <TASK>
>>>>>>        ? __warn+0x83/0x130
>>>>>>        ? unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x8d9/0x930
>>>>>>        ? report_bug+0x18e/0x1a0
>>>>>>        ? handle_bug+0x54/0x90
>>>>>>        ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x70
>>>>>>        ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
>>>>>>        ? unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x8d9/0x930
>>>>>>        ? bond_net_exit_batch_rtnl+0x5c/0x90
>>>>>>        cleanup_net+0x237/0x3d0
>>>>>>        process_one_work+0x163/0x390
>>>>>>        worker_thread+0x293/0x3b0
>>>>>>        ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
>>>>>>        kthread+0xec/0x1e0
>>>>>>        ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
>>>>>>        ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
>>>>>>        ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x50
>>>>>>        ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
>>>>>>        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
>>>>>>        </TASK>
>>>>>>       ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixes: 9e2ee5c7e7c3 ("net, bonding: Add XDP support to the bonding driver")
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Wang Liang <wangliang74@...wei.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>    drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c | 3 +++
>>>>>>    1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
>>>>>> index 327b6ecdc77e..127181866829 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
>>>>>> @@ -868,6 +868,9 @@ static bool bond_set_xfrm_features(struct bonding *bond)
>>>>>>    static int bond_option_mode_set(struct bonding *bond,
>>>>>>                    const struct bond_opt_value *newval)
>>>>>>    {
>>>>>> +    if (bond->xdp_prog)
>>>>>> +        return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>>>> +
>>>>> Should we allow changing as long as the new mode also supports XDP?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Toke
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>> I think we should allow it, the best way probably is to add a new option
>>>> BOND_VALFLAG_XDP_UNSUPP (for example) as a bond option flag and to set
>>>> it in bond_options.c for each mode that doesn't support XDP, then you
>>>> can do the check in a generic way (for any option) in
>>>> bond_opt_check_deps. Any bond option that can't be changed with XDP prog
>>> err, I meant any bond option's value that isn't supported with XDP, for
>>> a whole option it would be a bit different
>> Thanks for your suggestions!
>>
>> When install xdp prog, bond_xdp_set() use bond_xdp_check() to check whether the bond mode support xdp.
>>
>> When uninstall xdp prog, the paramter prog of bond_xdp_set() is NULL. How about not call bond_xdp_check() to avoid the warning when the prog is NULL, like:
>>
>> static int bond_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
>>              struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>      ...
>>      if (prog && !bond_xdp_check(bond))
> No, this could cause other problems. Actually, for -net I think the best would be to stick to
> a simpler fix and just do bond_xdp_check() if there's a XDP program attached when changing
> the mode so it can be backported easier. The option value flag can be done in the future
> if more option values (or options) need to be disabled for XDP.
>
> Cheers,
>   Nik
Excuse me again. I hope that I haven't misunderstood your suggestions.

When I try to do bond_xdp_check() if there's a XDP program attached when
changing the mode in function bond_option_mode_set(). bond_xdp_check()
visit bond->params.mode and bond->params.xmit_policy, should I create a
new function, whose paramter is int mode?

Looking forward to getting more replies. Thanks.
>>>> should have that flag set.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>    Nik
>>>>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ