linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: eon: fix lock and non-SFDP flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47905b67-c0b5-45c9-98e2-0dc4dcf9651e@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:12:32 +0200
From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
To: Jakub Czapiga <czapiga@...gle.com>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>, Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>,
 Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
 Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
 linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: eon: fix lock and non-SFDP flags



On 17.03.2025 20:18, Jakub Czapiga wrote:
> Set appropriate FLASH lock feature flags for chips that support it.
> Set top-bottom protection bit flag for chips that support it.
> Add no-SFDP flags for chips with missing SFDP or without clear
> SFDP description regarding 4K sectors, dual and quad read support.
> Remove no-SFDP flags for chips which documentation states that this
> information can be extracted from SFDP.

Patches per flash please. Then dedicated patch for each logical change.
With testing.

Thanks,
ta