[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9lHjsIl-b_Jgc6O@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 10:14:38 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
Thangaraj Samynathan <Thangaraj.S@...rochip.com>,
Rengarajan Sundararajan <Rengarajan.S@...rochip.com>,
kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.org>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 08/10] net: usb: lan78xx: Transition
get/set_pause to phylink
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 10:34:08AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Replace lan78xx_get_pause and lan78xx_set_pause implementations with
> phylink-based functions. This transition aligns pause parameter handling
> with the phylink API, simplifying the code and improving
> maintainability.
Doesn't this user API get broken in patch 3 (in other words, shouldn't
this patch be part of patch 3) ?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists