[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9r7ORwztMxsNyF4@zx2c4.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 18:13:29 +0100
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Markus Theil <theil.markus@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/selftests: use prandom in selftest
Hi Andi,
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 06:19:12PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 07:33:30AM +0100, Markus Theil wrote:
> > This is part of a prandom cleanup, which removes
> > next_pseudo_random32 and replaces it with the standard PRNG.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Markus Theil <theil.markus@...il.com>
>
> I merged just this patch in drm-intel-gt-next.
This is minorly annoying for me... What am I supposed to do with patches
2 and 3? Take them through my tree for 6.16 in like half a year? Can I
just take the v1 into my tree and we can get this done with straight
forwardly? Or do you have a different suggestion for me?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists