[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874izmd0g4.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 14:37:15 +0200
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>, Andi Shyti
<andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Markus Theil <theil.markus@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/selftests: use prandom in selftest
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025, "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com> wrote:
> Hi Andi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 06:19:12PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
>> Hi Markus,
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 07:33:30AM +0100, Markus Theil wrote:
>> > This is part of a prandom cleanup, which removes
>> > next_pseudo_random32 and replaces it with the standard PRNG.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Markus Theil <theil.markus@...il.com>
>>
>> I merged just this patch in drm-intel-gt-next.
>
> This is minorly annoying for me... What am I supposed to do with patches
> 2 and 3? Take them through my tree for 6.16 in like half a year? Can I
> just take the v1 into my tree and we can get this done with straight
> forwardly? Or do you have a different suggestion for me?
Feel free to apply it to your tree too. It's not ideal to have two
commits for the same thing, but oh well.
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists