[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9tABRzmYYYUyEFO@google.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:07:01 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf trace: Implement syscall summary in BPF
Hello Howard,
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 12:00:10PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> Hello Namhyung,
>
> Can you please rebase it? I cannot apply it, getting:
>
> perf $ git apply --reject --whitespace=fix
> ./v2_20250317_namhyung_perf_trace_implement_syscall_summary_in_bpf.mbx
> Checking patch tools/perf/Documentation/perf-trace.txt...
> Checking patch tools/perf/Makefile.perf...
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 1198 (offset -8 lines).
> Checking patch tools/perf/builtin-trace.c...
> error: while searching for:
> bool hexret;
> };
>
> enum summary_mode {
> SUMMARY__NONE = 0,
> SUMMARY__BY_TOTAL,
> SUMMARY__BY_THREAD,
> };
>
> struct trace {
> struct perf_tool tool;
> struct {
>
> error: patch failed: tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:140
Oops, I think I forgot to say it's on top of Ian's change.
Please try this first. Sorry for the confusion.
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250319050741.269828-1-irogers@google.com
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists