[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250319092951.37667-16-jirislaby@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:29:08 +0100
From: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: maz@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Marek BehĂșn <kabel@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 15/57] irqdomain: bus: Switch to irq_domain_create_simple()
irq_domain_add_simple() is going away as being obsolete now. Switch to
the preferred irq_domain_create_simple(). That differs in the first
parameter: It takes more generic struct fwnode_handle instead of struct
device_node. Therefore, of_fwnode_handle() is added around the
parameter.
Note some of the users can likely use dev->fwnode directly instead of
indirect of_fwnode_handle(dev->of_node). But dev->fwnode is not
guaranteed to be set for all, so this has to be investigated on case to
case basis (by people who can actually test with the HW).
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc: "Marek BehĂșn" <kabel@...nel.org>
---
drivers/bus/moxtet.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bus/moxtet.c b/drivers/bus/moxtet.c
index 1e57ebfb7622..6c3e5c5dae10 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/moxtet.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/moxtet.c
@@ -737,9 +737,9 @@ static int moxtet_irq_setup(struct moxtet *moxtet)
{
int i, ret;
- moxtet->irq.domain = irq_domain_add_simple(moxtet->dev->of_node,
- MOXTET_NIRQS, 0,
- &moxtet_irq_domain, moxtet);
+ moxtet->irq.domain = irq_domain_create_simple(of_fwnode_handle(moxtet->dev->of_node),
+ MOXTET_NIRQS, 0,
+ &moxtet_irq_domain, moxtet);
if (moxtet->irq.domain == NULL) {
dev_err(moxtet->dev, "Could not add IRQ domain\n");
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists