linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 22/57] irqdomain: mailbox: Switch to irq_domain_create

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250319092951.37667-23-jirislaby@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:29:15 +0100
From: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: maz@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
	Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 22/57] irqdomain: mailbox: Switch to irq_domain_create_tree()

irq_domain_add_tree() is going away as being obsolete now. Switch to
the preferred irq_domain_create_tree(). That differs in the first
parameter: It takes more generic struct fwnode_handle instead of struct
device_node. Therefore, of_fwnode_handle() is added around the
parameter.

Note some of the users can likely use dev->fwnode directly instead of
indirect of_fwnode_handle(dev->of_node). But dev->fwnode is not
guaranteed to be set for all, so this has to be investigated on case to
case basis (by people who can actually test with the HW).

Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
---
 drivers/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.c b/drivers/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.c
index 0b17a38ea6bf..ea44ffb5ce1a 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.c
@@ -312,8 +312,8 @@ static int qcom_ipcc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!name)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	ipcc->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_tree(pdev->dev.of_node,
-					       &qcom_ipcc_irq_ops, ipcc);
+	ipcc->irq_domain = irq_domain_create_tree(of_fwnode_handle(pdev->dev.of_node),
+						  &qcom_ipcc_irq_ops, ipcc);
 	if (!ipcc->irq_domain)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-- 
2.49.0