[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ba823a10-3199-4702-8821-03dd88d45212@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:59:19 +0000
From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/topology: Fix sched_is_eas_possible() prints
Add the missing newline on two failure prints to ensure EAS abort
reasons don't go missing.
Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>
---
kernel/sched/topology.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index c49aea8c1025..18e804b416f5 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static bool sched_is_eas_possible(const struct cpumask *cpu_mask)
if (!arch_scale_freq_invariant()) {
if (sched_debug()) {
- pr_info("rd %*pbl: Checking EAS: frequency-invariant load tracking not yet supported",
+ pr_info("rd %*pbl: Checking EAS: frequency-invariant load tracking not yet supported\n",
cpumask_pr_args(cpu_mask));
}
return false;
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static bool sched_is_eas_possible(const struct cpumask *cpu_mask)
policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(i);
if (!policy) {
if (sched_debug()) {
- pr_info("rd %*pbl: Checking EAS, cpufreq policy not set for CPU: %d",
+ pr_info("rd %*pbl: Checking EAS, cpufreq policy not set for CPU: %d\n",
cpumask_pr_args(cpu_mask), i);
}
return false;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists