[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9w92CmC51cLN3PD@sidongui-MacBookPro.local>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 01:10:00 +0900
From: Sidong Yang <sidong.yang@...iosa.ai>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, dsterba@...e.cz,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [RFC PATCH v5 0/5] introduce
io_uring_cmd_import_fixed_vec
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 12:04:33PM +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 3/20/25 01:47, Sidong Yang wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:10:07AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On 3/19/25 11:07 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 09:27:37AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > > On 3/19/25 9:26 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 06:12:46 +0000, Sidong Yang wrote:
> > > > > > > This patche series introduce io_uring_cmd_import_vec. With this function,
> > > > > > > Multiple fixed buffer could be used in uring cmd. It's vectored version
> > > > > > > for io_uring_cmd_import_fixed(). Also this patch series includes a usage
> > > > > > > for new api for encoded read/write in btrfs by using uring cmd.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There was approximately 10 percent of performance improvements through benchmark.
> > > > > > > The benchmark code is in
> > > > > > > https://github.com/SidongYang/btrfs-encoded-io-test/blob/main/main.c
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [...]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Applied, thanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1/5] io_uring: rename the data cmd cache
> > > > > > commit: 575e7b0629d4bd485517c40ff20676180476f5f9
> > > > > > [2/5] io_uring/cmd: don't expose entire cmd async data
> > > > > > commit: 5f14404bfa245a156915ee44c827edc56655b067
> > > > > > [3/5] io_uring/cmd: add iovec cache for commands
> > > > > > commit: fe549edab6c3b7995b58450e31232566b383a249
> > > > > > [4/5] io_uring/cmd: introduce io_uring_cmd_import_fixed_vec
> > > > > > commit: b24cb04c1e072ecd859a98b2e4258ca8fe8d2d4d
> > > > >
> > > > > 1-4 look pretty straight forward to me - I'll be happy to queue the
> > > > > btrfs one as well if the btrfs people are happy with it, just didn't
> > > > > want to assume anything here.
> > > >
> > > > For 6.15 is too late so it makes more sense to take it through the btrfs
> > > > patches targetting 6.16.
> > >
> > > No problem - Sidong, guessing you probably want to resend patch 5/5 once
> > > btrfs has a next branch based on 6.15-rc1 or later.
> >
> > Thanks, I'll resend only patch 5/5 then.
>
> And please do send the fix, that should always be done first,
> especially if it conflicts with the current patch as they usually
> go to different trees and the fix might need to be backported.
Sorry to forget to cc you Pavel.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20250319180416.GL32661@twin.jikos.cz/T/#t
Thanks,
Sidong
>
> --
> Pavel Begunkov
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists