[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9xbBSaephBj-OO1@google.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 18:14:29 +0000
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: x86: Add a module param to control and
enumerate device posted IRQs
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 10:59:19AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2025, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index f76d655dc9a8..e7eb2198db26 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -227,6 +227,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(allow_smaller_maxphyaddr);
> > bool __read_mostly enable_apicv = true;
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enable_apicv);
> >
> > +bool __read_mostly enable_device_posted_irqs = true;
> > +module_param(enable_device_posted_irqs, bool, 0444);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enable_device_posted_irqs);
> > +
> > const struct _kvm_stats_desc kvm_vm_stats_desc[] = {
> > KVM_GENERIC_VM_STATS(),
> > STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, mmu_shadow_zapped),
> > @@ -9772,6 +9776,9 @@ int kvm_x86_vendor_init(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops)
> > if (r != 0)
> > goto out_mmu_exit;
> >
> > + enable_device_posted_irqs &= enable_apicv &&
> > + irq_remapping_cap(IRQ_POSTING_CAP);
>
> Drat, this is flawed. Putting the module param in kvm.ko means that loading
> kvm.ko with enable_device_posted_irqs=true, but a vendor module with APICv/AVIC
> disabled, leaves enable_device_posted_irqs disabled for the lifetime of kvm.ko.
> I.e. reloading the vendor module with APICv/AVIC enabled can't enable device
> posted IRQs.
>
> Option #1 is to do what we do for enable_mmio_caching, and snapshot userspace's
> desire.
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index e7eb2198db26..c84ad9109108 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ bool __read_mostly enable_apicv = true;
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enable_apicv);
>
> bool __read_mostly enable_device_posted_irqs = true;
> +bool __ro_after_init allow_device_posted_irqs;
> module_param(enable_device_posted_irqs, bool, 0444);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enable_device_posted_irqs);
>
> @@ -9776,8 +9777,8 @@ int kvm_x86_vendor_init(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops)
> if (r != 0)
> goto out_mmu_exit;
>
> - enable_device_posted_irqs &= enable_apicv &&
> - irq_remapping_cap(IRQ_POSTING_CAP);
> + enable_device_posted_irqs = allow_device_posted_irqs && enable_apicv &&
> + irq_remapping_cap(IRQ_POSTING_CAP);
>
> kvm_ops_update(ops);
>
> @@ -14033,6 +14034,8 @@ EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_rmp_fault);
>
> static int __init kvm_x86_init(void)
> {
> + allow_device_posted_irqs = enable_device_posted_irqs;
> +
> kvm_init_xstate_sizes();
>
> kvm_mmu_x86_module_init();
>
>
> Option #2 is to shove the module param into vendor code, but leave the variable
> in kvm.ko, like we do for enable_apicv.
>
> I'm leaning toward option #2, as it's more flexible, arguably more intuitive, and
> doesn't prevent putting the logic in kvm_x86_vendor_init().
+1, option #1 seems a bit confusing to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists