[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9zHju4PIJ+eunli@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 09:57:34 +0800
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: x86: Add a module param to control and
enumerate device posted IRQs
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 10:59:19AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 20, 2025, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index f76d655dc9a8..e7eb2198db26 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -227,6 +227,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(allow_smaller_maxphyaddr);
>> bool __read_mostly enable_apicv = true;
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enable_apicv);
>>
>> +bool __read_mostly enable_device_posted_irqs = true;
>> +module_param(enable_device_posted_irqs, bool, 0444);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enable_device_posted_irqs);
can this variable be declared as static?
>> +
>> const struct _kvm_stats_desc kvm_vm_stats_desc[] = {
>> KVM_GENERIC_VM_STATS(),
>> STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, mmu_shadow_zapped),
>> @@ -9772,6 +9776,9 @@ int kvm_x86_vendor_init(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops)
>> if (r != 0)
>> goto out_mmu_exit;
>>
>> + enable_device_posted_irqs &= enable_apicv &&
>> + irq_remapping_cap(IRQ_POSTING_CAP);
>
>Drat, this is flawed. Putting the module param in kvm.ko means that loading
>kvm.ko with enable_device_posted_irqs=true, but a vendor module with APICv/AVIC
>disabled, leaves enable_device_posted_irqs disabled for the lifetime of kvm.ko.
>I.e. reloading the vendor module with APICv/AVIC enabled can't enable device
>posted IRQs.
>
>Option #1 is to do what we do for enable_mmio_caching, and snapshot userspace's
>desire.
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>index e7eb2198db26..c84ad9109108 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>@@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ bool __read_mostly enable_apicv = true;
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enable_apicv);
>
> bool __read_mostly enable_device_posted_irqs = true;
>+bool __ro_after_init allow_device_posted_irqs;
> module_param(enable_device_posted_irqs, bool, 0444);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enable_device_posted_irqs);
>
>@@ -9776,8 +9777,8 @@ int kvm_x86_vendor_init(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops)
> if (r != 0)
> goto out_mmu_exit;
>
>- enable_device_posted_irqs &= enable_apicv &&
>- irq_remapping_cap(IRQ_POSTING_CAP);
>+ enable_device_posted_irqs = allow_device_posted_irqs && enable_apicv &&
>+ irq_remapping_cap(IRQ_POSTING_CAP);
Can we simply drop this ...
>
> kvm_ops_update(ops);
>
>@@ -14033,6 +14034,8 @@ EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_rmp_fault);
>
> static int __init kvm_x86_init(void)
> {
>+ allow_device_posted_irqs = enable_device_posted_irqs;
>+
> kvm_init_xstate_sizes();
>
> kvm_mmu_x86_module_init();
>
>
>Option #2 is to shove the module param into vendor code, but leave the variable
>in kvm.ko, like we do for enable_apicv.
>
>I'm leaning toward option #2, as it's more flexible, arguably more intuitive, and
>doesn't prevent putting the logic in kvm_x86_vendor_init().
>
and do
bool kvm_arch_has_irq_bypass(void)
{
return enable_device_posted_irqs && enable_apicv &&
irq_remapping_cap(IRQ_POSTING_CAP);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists