linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH linux-next] net: atm: use sysfs_emit()/sysfs_emit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250320114448.GK280585@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 11:44:48 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: xie.ludan@....com.cn
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xu.xin16@....com.cn,
	yang.yang29@....com.cn
Subject: Re:  [PATCH linux-next] net: atm: use sysfs_emit()/sysfs_emit_at() instead of scnprintf().

On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 03:29:33PM +0800, xie.ludan@....com.cn wrote:
> From: XieLudan <xie.ludan@....com.cn>
> 
> Follow the advice in Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst:
> show() should only use sysfs_emit() or sysfs_emit_at() when formatting
> the value to be returned to user space.
> 
> Signed-off-by: XieLudan <xie.ludan@....com.cn>

Thanks Xie Ludan,

As per or discussion offline,
please coordinate with your colleague
Tang Dongxing who has also posted a patch in this area.

  https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250317155102808MZdMkiovw52X0oY7n47wI@zte.com.cn/

It will be much easier for review if there is a single patch
that addresses these issues for ATM.

Also, please consider reading the following guidance on processes
for the networking subsystem of the Linux kernel. These are similar
but different to other subsystems.

  https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html

--
pw-bot: changes-requested