[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46a0a5e2-2def-4ed1-ab54-40b6c8393239@engleder-embedded.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 19:58:29 +0100
From: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>
To: xie.ludan@....com.cn
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
horms@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xu.xin16@....com.cn, yang.yang29@....com.cn, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] net: atm: use sysfs_emit()/sysfs_emit_at()
instead of scnprintf().
On 17.03.25 08:29, xie.ludan@....com.cn wrote:
> From: XieLudan <xie.ludan@....com.cn>
>
> Follow the advice in Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst:
> show() should only use sysfs_emit() or sysfs_emit_at() when formatting
> the value to be returned to user space.
>
> Signed-off-by: XieLudan <xie.ludan@....com.cn>
> ---
> net/atm/atm_sysfs.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/atm/atm_sysfs.c b/net/atm/atm_sysfs.c
> index 54e7fb1a4ee5..ae0d921157c5 100644
> --- a/net/atm/atm_sysfs.c
> +++ b/net/atm/atm_sysfs.c
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ static ssize_t type_show(struct device *cdev,
> {
> struct atm_dev *adev = to_atm_dev(cdev);
>
> - return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n", adev->type);
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", adev->type);
> }
>
> static ssize_t address_show(struct device *cdev,
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ static ssize_t address_show(struct device *cdev,
> {
> struct atm_dev *adev = to_atm_dev(cdev);
>
> - return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%pM\n", adev->esi);
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%pM\n", adev->esi);
> }
>
> static ssize_t atmaddress_show(struct device *cdev,
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static ssize_t atmaddress_show(struct device *cdev,
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&adev->lock, flags);
> list_for_each_entry(aaddr, &adev->local, entry) {
> - count += scnprintf(buf + count, PAGE_SIZE - count,
> + count += sysfs_emit_at(buf, count,
> "%1phN.%2phN.%10phN.%6phN.%1phN\n",
> &aaddr->addr.sas_addr.prv[0],
> &aaddr->addr.sas_addr.prv[1],
Does the alignment of the following argument lines needs to be adapted?
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static ssize_t atmindex_show(struct device *cdev,
> {
> struct atm_dev *adev = to_atm_dev(cdev);
>
> - return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", adev->number);
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", adev->number);
> }
>
> static ssize_t carrier_show(struct device *cdev,
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static ssize_t carrier_show(struct device *cdev,
> {
> struct atm_dev *adev = to_atm_dev(cdev);
>
> - return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n",
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n",
> adev->signal == ATM_PHY_SIG_LOST ? 0 : 1);
Adapt alignment of following line?
Gerhard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists