linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v5 5/5] btrfs: ioctl: introduce btrfs_uring_import

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <14f5b4bc-e189-4b18-9fe6-a98c91e96d3d@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 12:01:42 +0000
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: Sidong Yang <sidong.yang@...iosa.ai>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
 David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 5/5] btrfs: ioctl: introduce
 btrfs_uring_import_iovec()

On 3/19/25 06:12, Sidong Yang wrote:
> This patch introduces btrfs_uring_import_iovec(). In encoded read/write
> with uring cmd, it uses import_iovec without supporting fixed buffer.
> btrfs_using_import_iovec() could use fixed buffer if cmd flags has
> IORING_URING_CMD_FIXED.

Looks fine to me. The only comment, it appears btrfs silently ignored
IORING_URING_CMD_FIXED before, so theoretically it changes the uapi.
It should be fine, but maybe we should sneak in and backport a patch
refusing the flag for older kernels?

Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Sidong Yang <sidong.yang@...iosa.ai>
> ---
>   fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>   1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> index 6c18bad53cd3..e5b4af41ca6b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> @@ -4802,7 +4802,29 @@ struct btrfs_uring_encoded_data {
>   	struct iov_iter iter;
>   };
>   
> -static int btrfs_uring_encoded_read(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issue_flags)
> +static int btrfs_uring_import_iovec(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> +				    unsigned int issue_flags, int rw)
> +{
> +	struct btrfs_uring_encoded_data *data =
> +		io_uring_cmd_get_async_data(cmd)->op_data;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (cmd->flags & IORING_URING_CMD_FIXED) {
> +		data->iov = NULL;
> +		ret = io_uring_cmd_import_fixed_vec(cmd, data->args.iov,
> +						    data->args.iovcnt, rw,
> +						    &data->iter, issue_flags);
> +	} else {
> +		data->iov = data->iovstack;
> +		ret = import_iovec(rw, data->args.iov, data->args.iovcnt,
> +				   ARRAY_SIZE(data->iovstack), &data->iov,
> +				   &data->iter);
> +	}
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int btrfs_uring_encoded_read(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> +				    unsigned int issue_flags)
>   {
>   	size_t copy_end_kernel = offsetofend(struct btrfs_ioctl_encoded_io_args, flags);
>   	size_t copy_end;
> @@ -4874,10 +4896,7 @@ static int btrfs_uring_encoded_read(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issue
>   			goto out_acct;
>   		}
>   
> -		data->iov = data->iovstack;
> -		ret = import_iovec(ITER_DEST, data->args.iov, data->args.iovcnt,
> -				   ARRAY_SIZE(data->iovstack), &data->iov,
> -				   &data->iter);
> +		ret = btrfs_uring_import_iovec(cmd, issue_flags, ITER_DEST);
>   		if (ret < 0)
>   			goto out_acct;
>   
> @@ -5022,10 +5041,7 @@ static int btrfs_uring_encoded_write(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issu
>   		if (data->args.len > data->args.unencoded_len - data->args.unencoded_offset)
>   			goto out_acct;
>   
> -		data->iov = data->iovstack;
> -		ret = import_iovec(ITER_SOURCE, data->args.iov, data->args.iovcnt,
> -				   ARRAY_SIZE(data->iovstack), &data->iov,
> -				   &data->iter);
> +		ret = btrfs_uring_import_iovec(cmd, issue_flags, ITER_SOURCE);
>   		if (ret < 0)
>   			goto out_acct;
>   

-- 
Pavel Begunkov