linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] firmware: config: ti-sci: Default set to ARCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <818de9a7-b308-4e00-9eba-3f58e1d89bbd@baylibre.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 14:41:45 +0100
From: Guillaume La Roque <glaroque@...libre.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
 Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] firmware: config: ti-sci: Default set to ARCH_K3 for
 the ti sci driver

Le 19/03/2025 à 22:45, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025, at 14:31, Guillaume La Roque wrote:
>> With ARCH_K3=y we cannot enable TI_SCI_PROTOCOL=m because
>> ARCH_K3 selects TI_SCI_PROTOCOL.
>>
>> Modify the logic to enable TI_SCI_PROTOCOL by default when ARCH_K3=y
>> allowing us to submit a future patch to remove select on ARCH_K3 without
>> breaking existing users.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Guillaume La Roque <glaroque@...libre.com>
>> ---
>> Link to comment done on last serie [1] we come back on first version of
>> series[2] to not use imply but set deps on ARCH_K3 in driver directly.
>> An other patch will be sent to update Kconfig.platform when this patch
>> is merged.
> I just merged the patch and hadn't seen the earlier discussion,
> just two small notes from me:
>
> - thanks for doing it this way instead of the backwards 'imply'
> - there is really no need to split it into two steps, since the
>    change to the Kconfig.platforms file logically goes with this
>    one and I would merge both through the SoC tree, having it
>    as a single patch would make sense.
>
>          Arnd

Hi,

thanks for merged.

i do what we ask me in review in fact or perhaps i misunderstand sorry 
for that.

Guillaume