[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ab329813-2903-4bd1-8734-ab36466650c2@roeck-us.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 10:09:59 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: "Encarnacion, Cedric justine" <Cedricjustine.Encarnacion@...log.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Delphine CC Chiu <Delphine_CC_Chiu@...ynn.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: pmbus: add lt3074
On 3/21/25 09:53, Encarnacion, Cedric justine wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Encarnacion, Cedric justine
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 12:10 PM
>> To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>; Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>; Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>;
>> Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>; Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>;
>> Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>; Delphine CC Chiu
>> <Delphine_CC_Chiu@...ynn.com>; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>> kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>> doc@...r.kernel.org; linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: pmbus: add lt3074
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Guenter Roeck <groeck7@...il.com> On Behalf Of Guenter Roeck
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2025 11:17 PM
>>> To: Encarnacion, Cedric justine
>>> <Cedricjustine.Encarnacion@...log.com>;
>>> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>; Krzysztof Kozlowski
>>> <krzk+dt@...nel.org>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>; Jean Delvare
>>> <jdelvare@...e.com>; Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>; Delphine CC
>>> Chiu <Delphine_CC_Chiu@...ynn.com>; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>>> kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>>> doc@...r.kernel.org; linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: pmbus: add lt3074
>>>
>>> [External]
>>>
>>> On 3/18/25 03:03, Encarnacion, Cedric justine wrote:
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Guenter Roeck <groeck7@...il.com> On Behalf Of Guenter Roeck
>>>>> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2025 12:33 AM
>>>>> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>>>>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>; Encarnacion, Cedric justine
>>>>> <Cedricjustine.Encarnacion@...log.com>; Krzysztof Kozlowski
>>>>> <krzk+dt@...nel.org>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>; Jean
>>>>> Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>; Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>;
>>>>> Delphine CC Chiu <Delphine_CC_Chiu@...ynn.com>;
>>>>> devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux- kernel@...r.kernel.org;
>>>>> linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org; linux- doc@...r.kernel.org;
>>>>> linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: pmbus: add lt3074
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h
>>>>> b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h index ddb19c9726d6..289767e5d599
>>>>> 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h
>>>>> @@ -512,7 +512,6 @@ int pmbus_regulator_init_cb(struct
>>>>> regulator_dev
>>> *rdev,
>>>>> { \
>>>>> .name = (_name), \
>>>>> .of_match = of_match_ptr(_name), \
>>>>> - .regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"), \
>>>>> .ops = &pmbus_regulator_ops, \
>>>>> .type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, \
>>>>> .owner = THIS_MODULE, \
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe someone can check if that works.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Guenter
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to follow up on this one. As of this writing, my
>>>> understanding is that the dt-binding should not expect regulators
>>>> subnodes for simple devices like this. There is already a similar
>>>> binding as mentioned in this thread particularly
>>>> "dt-bindings/regulator/infineon,ir38060". I think a binding without
>>>> the subnodes should still work with or without the change above.
>>>
>>> Interesting. I am not sure if it really works, though. I looked into
>>> the regulator code, and I don't immediately see the code path it would
>>> take.
>>>
>>>> With this, I'd like to know what the specific next steps are to
>>>> continue this patch series.
>>>
>>> Can you try on hardware using a devicetree file which doesn't have the
>>> regulators node ? If the current code works, just submit an updated
>>> (simplified) .yaml file and we should be good. If not, I have an
>>> untested patch series introducing another macro which doesn't set the
>>> regulators node.
>>
>> Okay. I'll test this and get back to you.
>
> The "simplified" dt file (without the regulators node) does not work with
> the current regulator_desc macro. I have also tried simply removing the
> regulators_node setting from the regulator_desc macro, and it does not
> work too. of_match looks for a certain regulator name in dt, and it seems
> like it must handle NULL cases as well as suggested previously. I would
> appreciate if this would be also verified on other ends. For now, I think I'll
> wait for another macro to be introduced in pmbus to support this kind of
> bindings.
>
Figured. As it turns out, there is also a patch series pending which tries
to fix the problem for ir38060 by changing its bindings.
I'll dig up my patch series to add a new macro and send it out as RFT.
Thanks,
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists