[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250321220520.GFZ93ioO0JtfhXCb1n@fat_crate.local>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 23:05:20 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] x86/sev: add SVSM vTPM probe/send_command
functions
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 10:01:17AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> Just a note, patch 2 adds `include/linux/svsm_vtpm.h`, that file is
> basically a translation of the AMD SVSM specification into structures and
> functions used to communicate with SVSM in the way it is defined by the
> specification.
>
> I realized that the file does not fall under any section of MAINTAINERS.
> How do you suggest we proceed?
>
> Should we create an SVSM section to maintain it, including the TPM driver
> and future other drivers,etc.?
This all belongs to the TPM drivers, right?
I.e., drivers/char/tpm/
So I guess add that header to the TPM DEVICE DRIVER section if the gents there
are fine with it...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists