lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z91K46zSMPzvjzvp@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 12:17:55 +0100
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
	"Maciej W . Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/1] MIPS: Fix idle VS timer enqueue

On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 11:44:10AM +0100, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 10:38 AM Thomas Bogendoerfer
> <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de> wrote:
> > do we really need that for a symbol local to that file ?
> 
> Not really, I can use the label directly.
> 
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 10:38 AM Thomas Bogendoerfer
> <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de> wrote:
> >
> > > +       /* Check idle interrupt region size. */
> > > +       .ifne   __r4k_wait_exit - __r4k_wait - 36
> >
> > I have to say, that I prefer my .if statement, since this clearly spells out
> > the comparision in the expression. Is there a reason for your version ?
> 
> Sure, let's keep your version.
> Can we use the "error" message above? (""Idle interrupt region size
> mismatch: expected 36 bytes."").
> Or at least something similar, I think it is easier to understand the
> reason for the error. What do you think?

the error message works for me :-)

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ