lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdY=bT7BFDOSd2BGiwu3aAHYqBxaTM1Sew=2t5MD_WCXbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 21:26:42 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] gpio: TODO: remove the item about the new debugfs interface

On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 4:49 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:

> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>
> The consensus among core GPIO stakeholders seems to be that a new
> debugfs interface will only increase maintenance burden and will fail
> to attract users that care about long-term stability of the ABI[1].
> Let's not go this way and not add a fourth user-facing interface to the
> GPIO subsystem.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/9d3f1ca4-d865-45af-9032-c38cacc7fe93@pengutronix.de/
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>

Okay then,
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ