linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] rust: drm: Add GPUVM abstraction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72=4+ubh0F5y2QMobFoyQPs4Aj7bOL8n4y9LzHxrb9Z2sQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 22:07:10 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, 
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, 
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, 
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>, 
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	Asahi Lina <lina@...hilina.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rust: drm: Add GPUVM abstraction

On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 8:38 PM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Yeah, I asked upstream if we could have something that at least
> detects what could have been intra-doc links, because that should not
> have too many false positives since it is a subset:
>
>     https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131510
>
> It is still tricky, because e.g. `Some` or `None` would need to be
> excluded, even if you require the exact same case. So it probably
> still requires extra heuristics.
>
> Then there is:
>
>     https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#doc_markdown
>
> which is closer to your idea. It has a few false positives (e.g.
> KUnit) from a quick try, so probably we cannot enable it for
> everything, unless we commit to maintain a list of terms in the
> config. It spots a handful of things we should fix, though -- I can
> send a few patches or create good first issues.

I went ahead and sent a quick series for the latter:

    https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20250324210359.1199574-1-ojeda@kernel.org/

Cheers,
Miguel