| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Z-JfH7VAm0DTTbVg@sumit-X1>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 13:15:35 +0530
From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...nel.org>
To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Olivier Masse <olivier.masse@....com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>,
Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
"T . J . Mercier" <tjmercier@...gle.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
azarrabi@....qualcomm.com, Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Daniel Stone <daniel@...ishbar.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/10] optee: smc abi: dynamic restricted memory
allocation
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 02:04:16PM +0100, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> Add support in the OP-TEE backend driver for dynamic restricted memory
> allocation using the SMC ABI.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c b/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> index a14ff0b7d3b3..aa574ee6e277 100644
> --- a/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> @@ -1001,6 +1001,69 @@ static int optee_smc_do_call_with_arg(struct tee_context *ctx,
> return rc;
> }
>
> +static int optee_smc_lend_rstmem(struct optee *optee, struct tee_shm *rstmem,
> + u16 *end_points, unsigned int ep_count,
> + u32 use_case)
> +{
> + struct optee_shm_arg_entry *entry;
> + struct optee_msg_arg *msg_arg;
> + struct tee_shm *shm;
> + u_int offs;
> + int rc;
> +
> + msg_arg = optee_get_msg_arg(optee->ctx, 2, &entry, &shm, &offs);
> + if (IS_ERR(msg_arg))
> + return PTR_ERR(msg_arg);
> +
> + msg_arg->cmd = OPTEE_MSG_CMD_LEND_RSTMEM;
> + msg_arg->params[0].attr = OPTEE_MSG_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_INPUT;
> + msg_arg->params[0].u.value.a = use_case;
> + msg_arg->params[1].attr = OPTEE_MSG_ATTR_TYPE_TMEM_INPUT;
> + msg_arg->params[1].u.tmem.buf_ptr = rstmem->paddr;
> + msg_arg->params[1].u.tmem.size = rstmem->size;
> + msg_arg->params[1].u.tmem.shm_ref = (u_long)rstmem;
> +
> + rc = optee->ops->do_call_with_arg(optee->ctx, shm, offs, false);
> + if (rc)
> + goto out;
> + if (msg_arg->ret != TEEC_SUCCESS) {
> + rc = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + rstmem->sec_world_id = (u_long)rstmem;
> +
> +out:
> + optee_free_msg_arg(optee->ctx, entry, offs);
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> +static int optee_smc_reclaim_rstmem(struct optee *optee, struct tee_shm *rstmem)
> +{
> + struct optee_shm_arg_entry *entry;
> + struct optee_msg_arg *msg_arg;
> + struct tee_shm *shm;
> + u_int offs;
> + int rc;
> +
> + msg_arg = optee_get_msg_arg(optee->ctx, 1, &entry, &shm, &offs);
> + if (IS_ERR(msg_arg))
> + return PTR_ERR(msg_arg);
> +
> + msg_arg->cmd = OPTEE_MSG_CMD_RECLAIM_RSTMEM;
> + msg_arg->params[0].attr = OPTEE_MSG_ATTR_TYPE_RMEM_INPUT;
> + msg_arg->params[0].u.rmem.shm_ref = (u_long)rstmem;
> +
> + rc = optee->ops->do_call_with_arg(optee->ctx, shm, offs, false);
> + if (rc)
> + goto out;
> + if (msg_arg->ret != TEEC_SUCCESS)
> + rc = -EINVAL;
> +
> +out:
> + optee_free_msg_arg(optee->ctx, entry, offs);
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * 5. Asynchronous notification
> */
> @@ -1252,6 +1315,8 @@ static const struct optee_ops optee_ops = {
> .do_call_with_arg = optee_smc_do_call_with_arg,
> .to_msg_param = optee_to_msg_param,
> .from_msg_param = optee_from_msg_param,
> + .lend_rstmem = optee_smc_lend_rstmem,
> + .reclaim_rstmem = optee_smc_reclaim_rstmem,
> };
>
> static int enable_async_notif(optee_invoke_fn *invoke_fn)
> @@ -1622,11 +1687,13 @@ static inline int optee_load_fw(struct platform_device *pdev,
>
> static int optee_sdp_pool_init(struct optee *optee)
> {
> + bool sdp = optee->smc.sec_caps & OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_SDP;
> + bool dyn_sdp = optee->smc.sec_caps & OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_DYNAMIC_RSTMEM;
> enum tee_dma_heap_id heap_id = TEE_DMA_HEAP_SECURE_VIDEO_PLAY;
> - struct tee_rstmem_pool *pool;
> - int rc;
> + struct tee_rstmem_pool *pool = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + int rc = -EINVAL;
>
> - if (optee->smc.sec_caps & OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_SDP) {
> + if (sdp) {
> union {
> struct arm_smccc_res smccc;
> struct optee_smc_get_sdp_config_result result;
> @@ -1634,25 +1701,24 @@ static int optee_sdp_pool_init(struct optee *optee)
>
> optee->smc.invoke_fn(OPTEE_SMC_GET_SDP_CONFIG, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
> 0, &res.smccc);
> - if (res.result.status != OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_OK) {
> - pr_err("Secure Data Path service not available\n");
> - return 0;
> - }
> + if (res.result.status == OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_OK)
> + pool = tee_rstmem_static_pool_alloc(res.result.start,
> + res.result.size);
> + }
>
> - pool = tee_rstmem_static_pool_alloc(res.result.start,
> - res.result.size);
> - if (IS_ERR(pool))
> - return PTR_ERR(pool);
> + if (dyn_sdp && IS_ERR(pool))
> + pool = optee_rstmem_alloc_cma_pool(optee, heap_id);
>
> + if (!IS_ERR(pool)) {
> rc = tee_device_register_dma_heap(optee->teedev, heap_id, pool);
> if (rc)
> - goto err;
> + pool->ops->destroy_pool(pool);
> }
>
> + if (rc && (sdp || dyn_sdp))
> + pr_err("Secure Data Path service not available\n");
Rather than an error message we should just use pr_info().
-Sumit
> +
> return 0;
> -err:
> - pool->ops->destroy_pool(pool);
> - return rc;
> }
>
> static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists