lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <174288877589.14745.11891370184181289037.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 07:46:15 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Jann Horn" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
 x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/dumpstack: Fix inaccurate unwinding from
 exception stacks due to misplaced assignment

The following commit has been merged into the x86/urgent branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     2c118f50d7fd4d9aefc4533a26f83338b2906b7a
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/2c118f50d7fd4d9aefc4533a26f83338b2906b7a
Author:        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
AuthorDate:    Tue, 25 Mar 2025 03:01:23 +01:00
Committer:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitterDate: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 08:30:43 +01:00

x86/dumpstack: Fix inaccurate unwinding from exception stacks due to misplaced assignment

Commit:

  2e4be0d011f2 ("x86/show_trace_log_lvl: Ensure stack pointer is aligned, again")

was intended to ensure alignment of the stack pointer; but it also moved
the initialization of the "stack" variable down into the loop header.

This was likely intended as a no-op cleanup, since the commit
message does not mention it; however, this caused a behavioral change
because the value of "regs" is different between the two places.

Originally, get_stack_pointer() used the regs provided by the caller; after
that commit, get_stack_pointer() instead uses the regs at the top of the
stack frame the unwinder is looking at. Often, there are no such regs at
all, and "regs" is NULL, causing get_stack_pointer() to fall back to the
task's current stack pointer, which is not what we want here, but probably
happens to mostly work. Other times, the original regs will point to
another regs frame - in that case, the linear guess unwind logic in
show_trace_log_lvl() will start unwinding too far up the stack, causing the
first frame found by the proper unwinder to never be visited, resulting in
a stack trace consisting purely of guess lines.

Fix it by moving the "stack = " assignment back where it belongs.

Fixes: 2e4be0d011f2 ("x86/show_trace_log_lvl: Ensure stack pointer is aligned, again")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250325-2025-03-unwind-fixes-v1-2-acd774364768@google.com
---
 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
index 91639d1..c6fefd4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ static void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
 	printk("%sCall Trace:\n", log_lvl);
 
 	unwind_start(&state, task, regs, stack);
+	stack = stack ?: get_stack_pointer(task, regs);
 	regs = unwind_get_entry_regs(&state, &partial);
 
 	/*
@@ -213,9 +214,7 @@ static void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
 	 * - hardirq stack
 	 * - entry stack
 	 */
-	for (stack = stack ?: get_stack_pointer(task, regs);
-	     stack;
-	     stack = stack_info.next_sp) {
+	for (; stack; stack = stack_info.next_sp) {
 		const char *stack_name;
 
 		stack = PTR_ALIGN(stack, sizeof(long));

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ