linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 10/13] serial: sh-sci: Add support for RZ/T2H SCI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z-KOQMx9IHQXwrt1@shikoro>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 12:06:40 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Thierry Bultel <thierry.bultel.yh@...renesas.com>
Cc: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
	"thierry.bultel@...atsea.fr" <thierry.bultel@...atsea.fr>,
	"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"geert@...ux-m68k.org" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@...renesas.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/13] serial: sh-sci: Add support for RZ/T2H SCI

> Would SERIAL_RZ_SCI_T2 (and rz-sci-t2 for the driver) be specific enough ?

For me, yes. That means at least "as first supported in RZ/T2". Only
RZ_SCI seems more arbitrary to me. It might show up in non-RZ platforms
later, and then RZ_SCI basically has no information gain.

That being said, I see that there doesn't seem to be an easily available
better name, and we are entering bike-shedding area. I do prefer
SERIAL_RZ_SCI_T2 but if you really want to keep this version, so be it.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)