linux-kernel - Re: [v6] dma-engine: sun4i: Simplify error handling in probe()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <77fbff4c-443d-4ed4-8335-a6cbec6b2809@web.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 13:38:57 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>,
 Csókás Bence <csokas.bence@...lan.hu>,
 dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>,
 Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
 Christophe Jaillet <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
 Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
 Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [v6] dma-engine: sun4i: Simplify error handling in probe()

> You're "concerned" about patch granularity, but this is not the sort
> of thing that some random person would raise, this is the sort of
> thing a maintainer asks for when patches are doing too many things or
> are unreviewable. …

May additional patch reviewers influence the software evolution another bit?


…
>>> What do you mean? …
…
> Once again your comments are just noise, and your insistence on
> repeating them over and over and over and over and over again is
> borderline harassment.

Some information needs to be repeated also according to known communication difficulties.
Corresponding views might be evolving further.


…
> Please block or ignore Markus, at best he's a nuisance and at worst a troll.
I hope that development discussions can become more constructive again.

Regards,
Markus