[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z-N0ep6Vv6D9QRik@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 03:28:58 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: wangchuanguo <wangchuanguo@...pur.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhiramat@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: migrate: restore the nmask after successfully
allocating on the target node
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 11:12:18AM +0800, wangchuanguo wrote:
> If memory is successfully allocated on the target node and the
> function directly returns without value restore for nmask,
> non-first migration operations in migrate_pages() by again label
> may ignore the nmask settings, thereby allowing new memory
> allocations for migration on any node.
I have no opinion on whether this is the right thing to do or not, but
if it is:
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1026,8 +1026,10 @@ struct folio *alloc_migrate_folio(struct folio *src, unsigned long private)
> mtc->nmask = NULL;
> mtc->gfp_mask |= __GFP_THISNODE;
> dst = alloc_migration_target(src, (unsigned long)mtc);
> - if (dst)
> + if (dst) {
> + mtc->nmask = allowed_mask;
> return dst;
> + }
>
> mtc->gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_THISNODE;
> mtc->nmask = allowed_mask;
this should be:
dst = alloc_migration_target(src, (unsigned long)mtc);
+ mtc->nmask = allowed_mask;
if (dst)
return dst;
mtc->gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_THISNODE;
- mtc->nmask = allowed_mask;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists