[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250326070825.GD2822343@rocinante>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:08:25 +0900
From: Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>
To: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>, lpieralisi@...nel.org,
vigneshr@...com, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, rogerq@...nel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
srk@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: j721e: Fix the value of linkdown_irq_regfield for
J784S4
Hello,
[...]
> > > > So I guess without this patch, we incorrectly ignore link-down
> > > > interrupts on J784S4. It's good to have a one-sentence motivation
> > > > like that somewhere in the commit log that we can pull out and include
> > > > in the merge commit log and the pull request.
> > >
> > > Yes, we can prepend the following to the existing commit message:
> > > "Link down interrupts on J784S4 SoC are missed because..."
> > >
> > > resulting in the following updated paragraph in the commit message:
> > > Link down interrupts on J784S4 SoC are missed because commit under Fixes
> > > assigned the value of 'linkdown_irq_regfield' for the....
> >
> > How does this look like?
> >
> > https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git/commit/?h=controller/j721e&id=b97b5b8cb603a4ba6b3f7f1b6065fa76e69bdb56
> >
> > Let me know if you want any changes.
>
> I will suggest minor changes to the first paragraph of the commit
> message resulting in the following paragraph:
>
> Commit under Fixes assigned the value of .linkdown_irq_regfield for the
> J784S4 SoC as the "LINK_DOWN" macro corresponding to BIT(1), and as a
> result, the Link Down interrupts on J784S4 SoC are missed.
OK. Updated. We are going to meet there half-way. :)
Thank you!
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists