lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ceb4ab8-adb5-46bf-98e4-61a1bd908e20@web.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 09:48:10 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Ye Liu <liuye@...inos.cn>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Ye Liu <ye.liu@...ux.dev>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
 Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/page_alloc: Consolidate unlikely handling in
 page_expected_state

> Consolidates the handling of
…
> This change simplifies
…
> ---
> V3: Delete 'This patch'.

How good does such information fit to the wording requirement “imperative mood”?
https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.14#n94

…
> ---
> ---
>  mm/page_alloc.c | 24 ++++++++----------------

How do you think about to omit redundant marker lines?

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ