[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <208f3edd-2be0-4edd-be25-d874d00b770d@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 10:57:28 +0530
From: Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>
To: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@...il.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski
<brgl@...ev.pl>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: davinci: add I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING to feature
list
Looks good to me.
On 3/26/2025 8:09 PM, Marcus Folkesson wrote:
> The driver do support I2C_M_IGNORE_NAK, so add
> I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING to the feature list.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@...il.com>
Acked-by: Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>
> ---
> The driver do support I2C_M_IGNORE_NAK, so the
> I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING bit should be set.
>
> I2C_M_IGNORE_NAK is the only supported "mangling-feature" though, but
> other i2c bus drivers also seems to support only a subset of available
> mangling-features, so I guess this is ok.
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c
> index 6a909d339681214ed4f382b62f8cd924f4295e69..6a3d4e9e07f45ecc228943e877cde1fd9d72e8cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c
> @@ -551,7 +551,8 @@ i2c_davinci_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[], int num)
>
> static u32 i2c_davinci_func(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
> {
> - return I2C_FUNC_I2C | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL;
> + return I2C_FUNC_I2C | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL |
> + I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING;
> }
>
> static void terminate_read(struct davinci_i2c_dev *dev)
>
> ---
> base-commit: 1e26c5e28ca5821a824e90dd359556f5e9e7b89f
> change-id: 20250326-i2c-5561bf853f8d
>
> Best regards,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists