lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVKfL-FRhDaFfOACV8R=ziqXdhmeW7Xd4WYXqHnSbR0ZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 09:55:17 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, 
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, 
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, 
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>, 
	linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>, 
	Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>, 
	Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] arm64: defconfig: Enable Renesas RZ/V2N SoC

Hi Krzysztof,

On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 at 08:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> On 26/03/2025 15:39, Prabhakar wrote:
> > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> >
> > Enable support for the Renesas RZ/V2N (R9A09G056) SoC in the ARM64
> > defconfig.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> > index 11e7d0ad8656..c7b41f86c128 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> > @@ -1483,6 +1483,7 @@ CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G054=y
> >  CONFIG_ARCH_R9A08G045=y
> >  CONFIG_ARCH_R9A09G011=y
> >  CONFIG_ARCH_R9A09G047=y
> > +CONFIG_ARCH_R9A09G056=y
>
> So the pattern will keep growing and none of you will ever bother to fix
> it, because you have your patchset to throw over the wall.

Yes, the pattern will keep on growing.
Just like the minimum kernel size will keep on growing, especially if
you can no longer compile a kernel without support for SoCs you do not
intend to run the kernel on.  Not everyone has GiBs of RAM to spare...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ