[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJM55Z9=0sxXiC20OEe=W0E5S_jHd6JW+7SWvW5JFiu4vpr=nQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 02:52:40 -0700
From: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>
To: Pinkesh Vaghela <pinkesh.vaghela@...fochips.com>,
Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Min Lin <linmin@...incomputing.com>,
Pritesh Patel <pritesh.patel@...fochips.com>, Yangyu Chen <cyy@...self.name>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Yu Chien Peter Lin <peterlin@...estech.com>, Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>,
Kanak Shilledar <kanakshilledar@...il.com>,
Darshan Prajapati <darshan.prajapati@...fochips.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@...com>, "rafal@...ecki.pl" <rafal@...ecki.pl>, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] riscv: dts: add initial support for EIC7700 SoC
Pinkesh Vaghela wrote:
> >
> > Hi Pinkesh,
> >
> > Thank your for the patches!
> >
> > Should this not be marked dma-noncoherent to avoid having to mark each
> > peripheral as such?
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
> We have not added "dma-noncoherent" because there are no DMA-capable
> peripherals in the devicetree yet.
> We planned to add this later when we add any DMA capable devices
> i.e. sdhci, gmac, sata, pcie, spi.
>
> Do you recommend to add this property in current version?
Yeah, Conor also answered this already.
> > > + gpio@...00000 {
> > > + compatible = "snps,dw-apb-gpio";
> > > + reg = <0x0 0x51600000 0x0 0x80>;
> > > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > > +
> > > + porta: gpio-port@0 {
> >
> > Maybe these labels could be something like gpioA, gpioB, etc. to not be
> > confused with an HDMI port fx.
>
> The gpio node labels are based on the example provided in
> "snps,dw-apb-gpio.yaml" dt-binding and other dtsi.
>
> Could you clarify more on how these labels cause confusion with HDMI
> port as I don't see any example for HDMI port using name as porta, portb?
Sure. Try git grep 'port.*:' -- '*.dts*' and you'll see that "port" labels are
used for many things that aren't GPIOs. It'll be a lot easier to scan through
the device tree and see what <&gpioA 27 0> references.
/Emil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists