lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z-Ug8FeyJ9fTMhNf@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 10:57:04 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@...e.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, "tamird@...il.com" <tamird@...il.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printf: add tests for generic FourCCs

On Wed 2025-03-26 00:26:08, Aditya Garg wrote:
> 
> 
> > On 26 Mar 2025, at 1:19 AM, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 03:45:01AM +0000, Aditya Garg wrote:
> >> From: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@...e.com>
> >> 
> >> Format specifiers for printing generic 32-bit FourCCs were recently added
> >> to vsprintf. They are going through the DRM tree alongwith the appletbdrm
> >> driver. Since the printf tests are being converted to kunit, this separate
> >> patch for the tests should make it easier to rebase when the merge window
> >> opens.
> >> 
> >> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/79FA3F41-FD7A-41D9-852B-D32606AF5EB4@live.com/T/#u
> >> Signed-off-by: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@...e.com>
> >> ---
> >> lib/tests/printf_kunit.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 
> > Linus has applied the kunit /lib move tree, so this patch can land via
> > regular trees now. Who should take it?
> 
> For some reason DRM has not taken up the patch set yet, even after approvals.
> I assume it's partly because gitlab.freedesktop.org was down for a whole week.
> Now that merge window is open, I myself dunno what is gonna happen with those patches.
> Also, I doubt DRM wants to take this up later. So, I have 2 options:
> 
> 1. Just wait a bit more, probably till merge window settles so that DRM can take up those patches and then you take this one up.
> 2. I'll just send you the non DRM patch, and upstream it via you so that atleast you can get free. Then. I'll tell DRM to just upstream the DRM relevant patch, again after merge windows settles. The patch is anyways a bug fix, rather than something new.

I prefer the first solution. I'll take this patch after the already
queued patches reach the mainline.

Best Regards,
Petr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ