linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/15] arm64: defconfig: Enable Renesas RZ/V2N SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z-VETFWFT5NksD7J@ninjato>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 13:27:56 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
	Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
	Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] arm64: defconfig: Enable Renesas RZ/V2N SoC


> So the pattern will keep growing and none of you will ever bother to fix
> it, because you have your patchset to throw over the wall.

I dare to say us Renesas people are not too bad at fixing stuff. In this
particular case, I don't see a wide consensus that the above stuff is
considered broken? Please point me to it if there is such. We are happy
to discuss.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)