[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cba249f6-5552-4538-a2fc-4fcd185fefd0@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 14:06:47 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Peter Chen <peter.chen@...tech.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, soc@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cix-kernel-upstream@...tech.com, marcin@...zkiewicz.com.pl,
kajetan.puchalski@....com, Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@...tech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] arm64: dts: cix: add initial CIX P1(SKY1) dts
support
On 27/03/2025 10:47, Peter Chen wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I thought we need to move one step and step before, and keep clean
>>> and avoid warning and error for every submission, but it seems not
>>> the way you prefer.
>>
>> No, from where did you get such impression? Maintainers-soc-clean-dts
>> explicitly covers this case and I WROTE IT, so how can I prefer
>> something else?
>>
>
> Krzysztof, I did not mean soc dts, I mean the mailbox binding checking
> warning which depends on this patch set.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/174290730775.1655008.14031380406017771195.robh@kernel.org/
Ah, right, true and usual solution is:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-soc.html#submitting-patches-to-the-main-soc-maintainers
point 3, but heh, I am repeating myself.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists