[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d6738cf-fc4c-4bc6-b986-9a647867e76f@quicinc.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 19:57:22 +0530
From: Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
CC: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, <linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Conor
Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [v2 2/3] i3c: master: Add Qualcomm I3C controller driver
On 3/29/2025 4:18 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 29/03/2025 14:38:14+0530, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote:
>> Hi Markus,
>>
>> On 3/29/2025 12:34 AM, Markus Elfring wrote:
>>>>> Under which circumstances would you become interested to apply a statement
>>>>> like “guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&gi3c->irq_lock);”?
>>>> Didn't get, hence a question. Do you suggest to use DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1 instead of existing method ?
>>> I propose to pick further opportunities up for benefits from scope-based resource management.
>>>
>> Sorry, still not clear to me what should i add/change ? please share me some
>> example.
>
> Don't change anything, Markus is wasting your time.
Clear to me. Thanks a lot !
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists