lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <838dfc8d-24c3-4f03-9c24-863259bb22b1@quicinc.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 20:01:03 +0530
From: Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, <linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <andersson@...nel.org>, <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: i3c: Add Qualcomm I3C master
 controller



On 3/29/2025 4:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/03/2025 10:08, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote:
>>>>>> +  I3C in master mode supports up to 12.5MHz, SDR mode data transfer in mixed
>>>>>> +  bus mode (I2C and I3C target devices on same i3c bus). It also supports
>>>>>> +  hotjoin, IBI mechanism.
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +  I3C Controller nodes must be child of GENI based Qualcomm Universal
>>>>>> +  Peripharal. Please refer GENI based QUP wrapper controller node bindings
>>>>>> +  described in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,geni-se.yaml.
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +allOf:
>>>>>> +  - $ref: i3c.yaml#
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +properties:
>>>>>> +  compatible:
>>>>>> +    const: qcom,i3c-master
>>>>>
>>>>> And this got worse. It makes also no sense either: how can you claim
>>>>> that this covers all possible future I3C masters from Qualcomm?
>>>>>
>>>>> What was the resolution of previous discussion?
>>>>>
>>>> Below was my understanding and reply.
>>>> "
>>>> I think i should remove const. kept it for now as no other compatible to
>>>> be added as of now.
>>>> let me remove const.
>>>> SoC name is not required, as this compatible is generic to all the SOCs.
>>>
>>> I don't see any talks about const, what are you referring to?
>>>
>> +properties:
>> +  compatible:
>> +    : qcom,i3c-geni
>> will this be fine ?
> 
> Yes, I think that was also suggested by Rob. Or rather follow existing
> style so qcom,geni-i3c for the compatible and filename.
> 
Sure, makes sense. With below i3c becomes similar in naming conventions 
to spi, i2c, serial uart.

Driver file name : i3c-qcom-geni.c
dt-binding file name: qcom,i3c-geni-qcom.yaml
compatible = "qcom,geni-i3c";
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ