[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250330182622.7cb826d9@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 18:26:22 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: David Heidelberg via B4 Relay <devnull+david.ixit.cz@...nel.org>
Cc: david@...t.cz, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Svyatoslav Ryhel
<clamor95@...il.com>, Robert Eckelmann <longnoserob@...il.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] iio: light: al3010: Use unsigned int for the
indexing
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 21:59:40 +0100
David Heidelberg via B4 Relay <devnull+david.ixit.cz@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
>
> The integer is used as array index which cannot be negative.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
I do find it hard to care about these, but you are making
other changes so fair enough I guess.
Applied patches 1-2
> ---
> drivers/iio/light/al3010.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/al3010.c b/drivers/iio/light/al3010.c
> index 7cbb8b203300907a88f4a0ab87da89cabdd087f3..4c2fd88ab32cd73f4735b0fa3014af084037c94d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/light/al3010.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/light/al3010.c
> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static int al3010_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> int val2, long mask)
> {
> struct al3010_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> - int i;
> + unsigned int i;
>
> switch (mask) {
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists