[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z+o6uhfMCsqru2v+@vaman>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 12:18:26 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: shao.mingyin@....com.cn
Cc: krzk@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org, wens@...e.org,
jernej.skrabec@...il.com, samuel@...lland.org,
zhang.enpei@....com.cn, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yang.yang29@....com.cn,
xu.xin16@....com.cn, ye.xingchen@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy/allwinner: phy-sun50i-usb3: Use dev_err_probe()
On 31-03-25, 10:32, shao.mingyin@....com.cn wrote:
> >On 28/03/2025 10:02, shao.mingyin@....com.cn wrote:
> >> From: Zhang Enpei <zhang.enpei@....com.cn>
> >>
> >> Replace the open-code with dev_err_probe() to simplify the code.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Zhang Enpei <zhang.enpei@....com.cn>
> >> Signed-off-by: Shao Mingyin <shao.mingyin@....com.cn>
> >
> >Why are you sending patch-by-patch? Organize your work for the same
> >subsystem into one patchset so we see entire picture at once, not spread
> >onto 10 separate threads.
> >
> >Best regards,
> >Krzysztof
>
> Dear Krzysztof,
> Thank you for the constructive feedback.
> We apologize for any inconvenience caused.We will regroup the patches
> targeting the same subsystem into a consolidated series.
Nice, while at it, please see the subsystem tagging style. Here it
should be "phy: allwinner: xxxxx"
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists