[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250331103257372kkrgDrRRskdABmXRnmbID@zte.com.cn>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 10:32:57 +0800 (CST)
From: <shao.mingyin@....com.cn>
To: <krzk@...nel.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: <kishon@...nel.org>, <wens@...e.org>, <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
<samuel@...lland.org>, <zhang.enpei@....com.cn>,
<linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <yang.yang29@....com.cn>,
<xu.xin16@....com.cn>, <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy/allwinner: phy-sun50i-usb3: Use dev_err_probe()
>On 28/03/2025 10:02, shao.mingyin@....com.cn wrote:
>> From: Zhang Enpei <zhang.enpei@....com.cn>
>>
>> Replace the open-code with dev_err_probe() to simplify the code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Enpei <zhang.enpei@....com.cn>
>> Signed-off-by: Shao Mingyin <shao.mingyin@....com.cn>
>
>Why are you sending patch-by-patch? Organize your work for the same
>subsystem into one patchset so we see entire picture at once, not spread
>onto 10 separate threads.
>
>Best regards,
>Krzysztof
Dear Krzysztof,
Thank you for the constructive feedback.
We apologize for any inconvenience caused.We will regroup the patches
targeting the same subsystem into a consolidated series.
Best regards,
Shao Mingyin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists