[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250331090756.L7iXi1Ee@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 11:07:56 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>,
Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: enable PREEMPT_LAZY
On 2025-03-05 12:15:35 [+0000], Mark Rutland wrote:
> Catalin, Will, given this is small and self-contained, I reckon it makes
> sense to pick this up ahead of Jinjie's series to move arm64 over to the
> generic entry library (which is on my queue of things to review). Even
> if we pick up both, it'll be easier to bisect and debug issues caused by
> this patch alone.
Any updates here? I know it is the merge window but I don't know if
upstream considers this or wants to sit on it until the generic entry
gets in.
In the meantime I stuff it into my RT tree so it does not get lost.
> Mark.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists