[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250429124528.GA25752@willie-the-truck>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:45:29 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>,
Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: enable PREEMPT_LAZY
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 11:07:56AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2025-03-05 12:15:35 [+0000], Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Catalin, Will, given this is small and self-contained, I reckon it makes
> > sense to pick this up ahead of Jinjie's series to move arm64 over to the
> > generic entry library (which is on my queue of things to review). Even
> > if we pick up both, it'll be easier to bisect and debug issues caused by
> > this patch alone.
>
> Any updates here? I know it is the merge window but I don't know if
> upstream considers this or wants to sit on it until the generic entry
> gets in.
> In the meantime I stuff it into my RT tree so it does not get lost.
Sorry for the delay; I'll pick this up in the arm64 tree today.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists