[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250331155436.zmor5g3h67773qcc@skbuf>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 18:54:36 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: pcs: lynx: fix phylink validation regression
for phy-mode = "10g-qxgmii"
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 04:46:42PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 06:39:06PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > Added by commit ce312bbc2351 ("net: pcs: lynx: accept phy-mode =
> > "10g-qxgmii" and use in felix driver"), this mode broke when the
> > lynx_interfaces[] array was introduced to populate
> > lynx->pcs.supported_interfaces, because it is absent from there.
>
> This commit is not in net-next:
>
> $ git log -p ce312bbc2351
> fatal: ambiguous argument 'ce312bbc2351': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
>
> Checking Linus' tree, it's the same.
>
> Are you sure lynx in mainline supports this mode?
>
> --
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Oops, you're right, please ignore me. I was working on a rebase and I
didn't even think to check whether the driver support for this new PHY
mode wasn't upstream. Now I'm starting to remember how the QCA8084 also
required it, and Luo Jie upstreamed the core support without users, and
without the Felix driver patch.
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists