[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025040109-dove-declared-9466@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 07:55:13 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jung Daehwan <dh10.jung@...sung.com>
Cc: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>, Puma Hsu <pumahsu@...gle.com>,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, mathias.nyman@...el.com,
perex@...ex.cz, conor+dt@...nel.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
corbet@....net, broonie@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com,
Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com, tiwai@...e.com, robh@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v36 01/31] xhci: sideband: add initial api to register a
secondary interrupter entity
On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 11:23:36AM +0900, Jung Daehwan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 09:12:12AM -0700, Wesley Cheng wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 3/27/2025 3:14 AM, Puma Hsu wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 3:02 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 02:27:00PM +0800, Puma Hsu wrote:
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> We have implemented and verified the USB audio offloading feature with
> > >>> the xhci sideband driver on our Google Pixel products. We would
> > >>> appreciate it if this solution can be accepted. Thank you all for the
> > >>> work!
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> Great, can you properly send a "Tested-by:" line for this against the
> > >> 00/XX email so that it will be properly saved?
> > >>
> > >
> > > We(Google Pixel) only use the xhci sideband related changes and two
> > > changes in the sound card driver. For the details, what we actually
> > > tested are patch [01], [02], [03], [04], [05], [06], [08], and [12].
> > > Do I still send the "Tested-by:" line to 00/31 email? Or should I just
> > > send the "Tested-by:" line to the 8 changes above? (I added
> > > "Tested-by" line for this [01/31] first.)
> > >
> > >> Also, I think a new version of the series is coming, can you test that
> > >> to verify it works properly? We have to wait until after -rc1 is out
> > >> anyway.
> > >>
> > >
> > > I think this v36 is the last version of the series as I discussed with
> > > QCOM Wesley. And for sure I will test it if they do have a new
> > > version.
> > >
> >
> > Hi Puma,
> >
> > I'm discussing with Stephan on the QC specific stuff, so the common changes
> > won't change on v37. Please provide your tested-by tags for each commit,
> > so I can carry them accordingly on the next submission. If I do end up
> > making changes to any of the common patches, I will remove your tested by
> > tag, which means you might have to test it again.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Wesley Cheng
> >
> >
> >
>
> Hi Wesley,
>
> Thanks for your effort to upstream usb audio offload.
> I've also used your patchset like Puma.
> ([01], [02], [03], [04], [05], [06], [08], and [12])
>
> It works well on Exynos. Please let me know if you need also
> "Tested-by:" on our side.
Yes please.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists