[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250401075021.GB98772@ubuntu>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 16:50:21 +0900
From: Jung Daehwan <dh10.jung@...sung.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>, Puma Hsu <pumahsu@...gle.com>,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, mathias.nyman@...el.com, perex@...ex.cz,
conor+dt@...nel.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, corbet@....net,
broonie@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com,
tiwai@...e.com, robh@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Mathias Nyman
<mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v36 01/31] xhci: sideband: add initial api to register a
secondary interrupter entity
On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 07:55:13AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 11:23:36AM +0900, Jung Daehwan wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 09:12:12AM -0700, Wesley Cheng wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 3/27/2025 3:14 AM, Puma Hsu wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 3:02 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 02:27:00PM +0800, Puma Hsu wrote:
> > > >>> Hi,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> We have implemented and verified the USB audio offloading feature with
> > > >>> the xhci sideband driver on our Google Pixel products. We would
> > > >>> appreciate it if this solution can be accepted. Thank you all for the
> > > >>> work!
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> Great, can you properly send a "Tested-by:" line for this against the
> > > >> 00/XX email so that it will be properly saved?
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > We(Google Pixel) only use the xhci sideband related changes and two
> > > > changes in the sound card driver. For the details, what we actually
> > > > tested are patch [01], [02], [03], [04], [05], [06], [08], and [12].
> > > > Do I still send the "Tested-by:" line to 00/31 email? Or should I just
> > > > send the "Tested-by:" line to the 8 changes above? (I added
> > > > "Tested-by" line for this [01/31] first.)
> > > >
> > > >> Also, I think a new version of the series is coming, can you test that
> > > >> to verify it works properly? We have to wait until after -rc1 is out
> > > >> anyway.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > I think this v36 is the last version of the series as I discussed with
> > > > QCOM Wesley. And for sure I will test it if they do have a new
> > > > version.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hi Puma,
> > >
> > > I'm discussing with Stephan on the QC specific stuff, so the common changes
> > > won't change on v37. Please provide your tested-by tags for each commit,
> > > so I can carry them accordingly on the next submission. If I do end up
> > > making changes to any of the common patches, I will remove your tested by
> > > tag, which means you might have to test it again.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Wesley Cheng
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Hi Wesley,
> >
> > Thanks for your effort to upstream usb audio offload.
> > I've also used your patchset like Puma.
> > ([01], [02], [03], [04], [05], [06], [08], and [12])
> >
> > It works well on Exynos. Please let me know if you need also
> > "Tested-by:" on our side.
>
> Yes please.
>
Tested-by: Daehwan Jung <dh10.jung@...sung.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists